What is going on in Australia?
http://www.colinandrews.net/Cloud-Radar-Circle-Australia-2010-0116.html
http://www.colinandrews.net/Cloud-Radar-Circle-Australia-2010-0122.html
What Now? Seen on radar by thousands today over Australia.
What is going on?
Anonymous details received today and new images seen by thousands.
January 22, 2010.
National Loop http://www.bom.gov.au/products/national_radar_sat.loop.shtml
http://www.asyura2.com/09/warb2/msg/704.html
———–
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
HAARP IS BUSY…
———
This picture is from one of my sites.. some of the links on the page are dead now.. pulses in the US in 2004.
http://www.resurrectingliberty.com/WeatherWars.html
———
All in Japanese..
Seen in Japan, back on 04AUG08 AND 25SEP09
http://www.asyura2.com/09/warb2/msg/719.html
——-
MU Radar IN JAPAN
You draw two triangles connecting 3 buildings each (with bluish roof), then you get a Star of David.
http://www-lab26.kuee.kyoto-u.ac.jp/study/mu/mu_e.html
MU Radar
The MU (Middle and Upper atmosphere) radar was constructed by Radio Atmospheric Science Center of Kyoto University at Shigaraki, Shiga prefecture, Japan (34.85deg N, 136.11deg E) in 1984 mainly for the purpose of investigating atmospheric and plasma dynamics in the wide region from the troposphere to the ionosphere.
The radar is a powerful monostatic pulse Doppler radar operating at 46.5MHz with an active phased array antenna, which consists of 475 crossed Yagi antennas and identical number of solid-state transmit/receive modules. This design realized a very fast beam steerability. The antenna beam direction can be switched to any direction within the steering range of 30deg from zenith from pulse to pulse. The antenna aperture is 8,330m^2 (103m in diameter), and the peak and average output power is 1MW and 50kW, respectively. The antenna beam has a conical shape with the round-trip (two-way) half-power beamwidth of 2.6deg.
http://www.kurasc.kyoto-u.ac.jp/radar-group/mu/index.html“>MU Radar Page (Radio Atmospheric Science Center)
——
——
research information….
http://klatnom.net/conspiracy/142/haarp-earthquakes-and-hurricanes
HAARP, Earthquakes, and Hurricanes
montalk.net » 13 July 08
Can HAARP manipulate storms, hurricanes, and earthquakes? There is definitely a correlation between these and when HAARP is active. This article will give some examples of that correlation. And while that alone does not prove a direct causal relationship, the physics of HAARP and the political agenda behind the program suggest that weather and earthquake manipulation is both possible and likely.
Background
I assume everyone reading this knows of HAARP. Less known is that HAARP is only one of several such facilities — and not the most powerful one either. There are others, here are five:
1) Mu Radar – 1 megawatt facility in Japan (34°51’14.80″N 136° 6’19.45″E).
2) Arecibo Observatory – 2 megawatt facility in Puerto Rico (18°20’38.97″N 66°45’9.77″W).
3) HIPAS – 70 megawatt facility east of Fairbanks, Alaska (64°52’21.18″N 146°50’18.78″W).
4) Sura – 190 megawatt facility in central Russia (56° 7’10.32″N 46° 2’4.41″E).
5) EISCAT – 1 gigawatt facility in Tromsø, Northern Norway (69°35’1.06″N 19°12’57.11″E).
(you can copy and paste the coordinates into google maps)
By comparison, HAARP (near Gakona, Alaska – 62°23’33.73″N 145° 9’2.61″W) is claimed to be a mere 3.6 megawatt facility — and that’s after being upgraded in 2006. It has 278 times less maximum power than the ionospheric heater in Norway.
Nevertheless, HAARP is far from useless. According to the DARPA:
Key to the current effort was the expansion of the experimental research facility that includes a 3.6 MW high-frequency transmitter and a variety of diagnostic instruments, to conduct investigations to characterize the physical processes that can be initiated and controlled in the ionosphere and space, via interactions with high power radio waves. Among these were: (1) the generation of extremely low frequency/very low frequency radio waves for submarine and other subsurface communication, and the reduction of charged particle populations in the radiation belts to ensure safe spacecraft systems operations; (2) the control of electron density gradients and the refractive properties in selected regions of the ionosphere to create radio wave propagation channels; and (3) the generation of optical and infrared emissions in space to calibrate space sensors.
A study completed by an Air Force/Navy Panel also pointed to additional high-value functions that can potentially be accomplished with the a 3.6 MW capability, in particular, the exploration and refinement of scientific principles that could lead to the development and deployment of a system to provide protection for spacebased assets from emergent asymmetric threats. (source)
HAARP alone has many applications, primarily military, and those listed above are just a small “safe to reveal” set of examples. If 3.6 MW can accomplish these, imagine what 1000 MW might do!
There is an interesting anecdotal account by Dan Eden of HAARP being used for surreptitious purposes. Furthermore, he claimed that there was a second, secret, more powerful installation in Alaska. Now in 2008, a decade later, the existence of that facility is no longer secret and its name is HIPAS, which is indeed almost twenty times as powerful as HAARP.
more at link above.
Go to the main page
